No ----- Original Message ----- From: "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 5:33 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: KT: dilettante morpho-syntactic analysis of some Brahma-suutras: 8
> > Just out of curiosity, is there any corollary between how parts of > Patanjali Yoga Sutras actually contain stuff to be practiced, and the > content of the Brahma Sutras? > > (I.e. are there particular sutras from BS to be used, and which are they?) > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> > >Topic (adhikaraNa) 5 consists of suutras 5 - 11. >> > >> >> Suutra 8: >> >> heyavattvaavacanaacca? (heyavattva? +ACs-ACs-ACs-ACs- avacanaat; ca) >> >> Glossary: >> >> heyavattva? fitness to be discarded? >> >> The devanaagarii here: >> >> http://www.swami-krishnananda.org/bs+ACs-ACs-ACs-AF8-1/1-1-05.html >> >> has "heyavattva", but the transliterated text >> below it has "heyatva". >> >> The transliterated here: >> >> > http://sanskritdocuments.org/doc+ACs-ACs-ACs-AF8-yoga/brahma+ACs-ACs-ACs-AF8-suutra.itx >> >> has "heyavattva" >> >> and here "heyatva": >> >> http://www.philosophy.ru/library/asiatica/indica/sutra/vedanta/hk.html >> >> avacana n. absence of a special assertion Ka1tyS3r. > +ACs-ACs-ACs-ACY-c. ; >> (mfn.) not >> expressing anything Jaim. ; not speaking , silent S3ak. >> >> Swami's tranlation: >> >> And (the Pradhana cannot be denoted by the word 'Self'), because it is >> not stated (by the scriptures) that It (Sat) has to be discarded. >> >> (Sorry, if those links don't function. I don't know where the >> heck those control charaters [ACs, etc.], or whatever, come from.) >> > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Or go to: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > and click 'Join This Group!' > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >
