--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > Another fun idea for a thread. > > > > > > (That is to say, *I* think it sounds like fun, but > > > by now you've all got a pretty clear idea of what > > > my idea of fun is like, so be warned.) > > > > > > We're all denizens of Fairfield Life, right? A few > > > of us are actual residents of Fairfield, Iowa. > > > > > > So, to those of the latter persuasion, which do > > > you think more represents the reality of daily life > > > in Fairfield, Iowa -- Maharishi's and the official > > > TM movement's ideas of what life is like in Fairfield, > > > Iowa, or the predominant 'Fairfield Life' view of > > > what life is like in Fairfield, Iowa? > > > > > > I mean, the TMO view would be that Fairfield is > > > pretty much TM-centered, one of the first incursions > > > of Heaven On Earth into kaliyuga. That is definitely > > > *not* the impression of the place I've gathered in > > > my time here on FFL. I get the feeling of a much more > > > varied, vibrant community, one...uh...somewhat less > > > fettered than its TMO counterpart. > > > > > > So what do you think, Fairfield-ites? Which more > > > reflects the 'reality' (from your subjective > > > perspective, naturally) of Fairfield, Iowa? The > > > official TMO view, or the Fairfield Life view? > > > > > > All opinions welcomed, Fairfield-ite or not. > > > > Hands, please: Who is this question designed to > > give Barry the opportunity to bash? > > Pursuing the Curtis ideal of trying to figure > out where the other person is coming from, and > deeply understand their point of view, are you > really *that* jealous that I can start a thread > that will probably draw some intelligent responses > from the people here and you can't?
Um, no. I'm pointing out that you started this thread, just as you started the one about enlightenment criteria, to give yourself a platform to put folks down (primarily TMers, of course). This one's even more transparent, especially since you jumped the gun and explained what the TMO-centered responses would be like, as if this somehow wouldn't have been dead obvious to everyone from the start. It's a completely fake question, in other words.