--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 3, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Marek Reavis wrote: > > > Comment below: > > > > ** > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > >> > > **snip** > >> > >> Certainly not on the commercial side of things, but on the spiritual > >> side of this, he constantly defers to GD. I always thought a comment > >> I heard years ago, when they had just unveiled the lineage painting > >> portrayed the truth of the matter. Someone on Purusha asked 'why are > >> you not in the picture' and M. responded 'oh I could never be part of > >> the lineage picture, the most I could be would be a doorkeeper'. In > >> other words he could never be more than just an emissary for the > >> tradition, leading people towards its. I found those remarks very > >> honest. In fact often on listening to M. I got the impression I was > >> listening to SBS, not M. A friend and I used to call it "channeling > >> Guru Dev" because that's exactly what it sounded like. He would even > >> look like SBS. > >> > > **end** > > > > This is my take on Maharishi, also, and why, regardless of any > > failings he may have, I retain such reverence and gratitude to him. > > He really did, I feel, reflect Guru Dev's glory in his own person. > > That transmission of Guru Dev and the fundamental teachings he > > conveyed impelled most, if not all of us on the path we still walk > > today, whether or not we still follow or revere Maharishi. > > > That's where we vary--having known of the damage done to at least > thousands (maybe hundreds of thousands) of beings, it would be > impossible for me to see that than for anything other than what it > is. I feel it's important to understand that a lot of this, from a > yogic perspective, is only more recently being observed as genuine > yogic masters from the Saraswati (and other) traditions see what has > happened to these people (at a yogic level). I therefore cannot help > but see the TMSP for what it is: the most intense form of suffering > available for human evolution on this planet (that I am aware of). > It's no surprise nature does not support it. > > And believe me, I wish I didn't have to say that, because it's not a > popular thing to say. >
So you agree with DeNaro that MMY is worse than the Rev. Jim Jones...
