They were not sent there for that reason. Sensual protections arose 
within the prescient field. Without that, there could not be a 
celerity of torment and wonder with which they were propelled into 
the night.

OffWorld


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Did they all see into the Buddha fields? Then they were not 
awakened, just
> perhaps not dreaming any longer. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of matrixmonitor
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 2:17 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Two Paradigms => thanks Jim
> 
> ---Yes, Tolle, Ramana, and Papaji are examples of individuals who 
> awakened more or less spontaneously without the need of prior 
> practices.  In a statistical curve, such persons are in the 
> 99.99999....% percentile.  The rest of us laggards need 
> good "techniques" like TM.
> 
> 
>  FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "amarnath" <anatol_zinc@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Namaste Jim,
> > 
> > Thanks for a very refreshing account with minimum labels and
> > conclusions. Simplicity seems to be a good pointer toward 
reality.
> > 
> > Especially your last three paragraphs impress me that your 
awakening
> > is in the right direction and genuine from what I understand from
> > Ammachi, Papaji and others.
> > 
> > Your account has some similarities with one( of many ) common 
> patterns
> > that I have been reading about: spiritual practices, gathering
> > knowledge, having experiences, perhaps siddhis, and finally some 
> sort
> > of letting it all go because it all seems somewhat burdensome and
> > complicated compared to the underlying simplicity of 
> stillness/beingness. 
> > 
> > Eckhart Tolle's path was a little different but still similar. 
He 
> was
> > searching for the meaning of life in academics which provided 
some
> > happiness alternating with deep anxiety and depression. He said 
that
> > suffering was his teacher and finally " `I' cannot live with 
> `myself'
> > " was the impetus for  the inquiry "Am `I' two or one?" and 
LETTING 
> GO
> > which resulted in the reduction of 80% of his mental thoughts. 
> > Letting go was not a choice, it was God's Grace, in my 
> understanding.
> > 
> > Sitting in Bliss on park benches for about two years followed. 
> Then, a
> > gradual integration and balance followed. In his case the 
letting go
> > was primary and then, the simple spiritual knowledge( relatively 
> free
> > from past ) followed later. What Eckhart teaches is relatively 
free
> > from the past, religions and traditions and accounts for his
> > popularity. Of course, the essence of his teaching is the same 
> because
> > truth is one.
> > 
> > One of Amma's statements is that a time will come, after enough
> > spiritual effort and enough suffering, when one will lose all 
grasp 
> on
> > wealth, health, finances and spiritual practices themselves; 
then,
> > there will be no choice but to surrender the ego completely. 
This 
> may
> > sound too drastic and perhaps not necessary for everyone; or 
perhaps
> > allegorical. But, then again "to completely surrender the ego
> > completely" is perhaps a goal not reached any other way? Just a
> > thought for the time being. 
> > 
> > Papaji points out that genuine awakening occurs when everything, 
all
> > concepts, all beliefs, everything is surrendered completely, at 
> least
> > for one moment.  He warns that preconceived concepts about higher
> > spiritual states can be a trap, because, as the mind becomes more
> > powerful on the spiritual path, the mind will create these 
> conceptual
> > higher states( different levels and all that ) and the ego will 
feel
> > it has arrived. The "ego" will feel that it is God.
> > 
> > It seems that was the case with a Rakshasa like Ravana who was 
very
> > adapt at spiritual austerities and siddhis. And perhaps explains 
the
> > fallen/false spiritual teacher scenerio. 
> > 
> > Jim, if you haven't read Papaji's "The Truth Is" and "Nothing 
Ever
> > Happened" I highly recommend these. 
> > 
> > "The Truth Is" provides hundreds of ways in which to flush out 
all 
> the
> > nooks and crannies where the ego can hide. See especially page 
399
> > "Sadhana: There is no Becoming Being"
> > 
> > "Nothing Ever Happened" is an excellent biography. Papaji was a 
> family
> > man, a military officer, and managing engineer. His self 
realization
> > started at age eight and matured in his 30's? when he met Ramana.
> > Before that he did plenty of spiritual practices on his own. So,
> > obviously, the "awakening" that he talks about has to be 
understood 
> in
> > the proper context; perhaps not understood but felt by ones 
> Beingness.
> > His mother was a sister of one of India's great sages.
> > 
> > Again Jim, thanks for Awakening and blessing all of us with your
> > simple, clear and genuine account.
> > 
> > Gob Bless,
> > amar
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
> wrote:
> > > > ....
> > >
> > > Interesting thought about the two paradigms. Reflecting about 
it 
> for 
> > > a bit, I've identified four distinct approaches that have 
taken 
> me: 
> > > 
> > > First, it was a matter of discovering what enlightenment was; 
how 
> it 
> > > was different from anything else, what it meant-- lasting from 
> the 
> > > time I was in high school until I learned TM. This was a time 
> where 
> > > I was searching several different paths, trying them on like 
> > > clothing and seeing how long I ended up wearing the garment. 
It 
> was 
> > > not a time characterized by striving for enlightenment, but 
> rather 
> > > finding the right vehicle in which to begin my journey.
> > > 
> > > The second mindset I found myself in was after I had begun TM, 
a 
> > > practice which had a lot of knowledge to offer, from reading 
the 
> > > Gita cover to cover, to taking the SCI course, to the myriad 
> taped 
> > > lectures of Maharishi, to the experiences of sustained 
rounding. 
> > > During this time I was interested in absorbing the totality of 
> the 
> > > knowledge available to me, and had some brief experiences 
which 
> > > caused me to step off the future/past train and enjoy life in 
the 
> > > Now. But such experiences were fleeting. I also learned about 
the 
> > > seven states of consciousness and very much wanted to achieve 
the 
> > > higher states, which I associated with those fleeting moments 
of 
> > > Now. I also felt that the whole world should begin TM 
including  
> > > everyone I knew, and gosh, what a dark world it was outside 
> of "TM 
> > > knowledge thinking". Looking back I can say that I was a rigid 
> and 
> > > judgmental person. Maybe this was necessary in order that I 
see 
> the 
> > > process all the way through. Or perhaps it was just the way a 
new 
> > > seeker sees the world, as a darkness in contrast to his newly 
> found 
> > > light.
> > > 
> > > After having absorbed the TM knowledge as fully as I could, 
and 
> > > after having learned the TM-Siddhis program, the third phase 
of 
> my 
> > > journey was characterized by rapid expansion of my awareness, 
> while 
> > > still feeling pinched inside. I had wonderful experiences of 
> > > extrasensory sight which persist to this day. I felt my mind 
> expand 
> > > to be able to know everything. My heart could experience 
> overflowing 
> > > love and darkest hatred within the span of a couple of 
seconds. 
> > > Every boundary was crumbling, but the knowledge I had learned 
> over 
> > > many years from the TM organization wasn't keeping up. I was 
> > > experiencing what appeared to be symptoms of CC and GC and 
even 
> UC 
> > > on a consistent basis, but when I wasn't, I felt trapped, 
> wretched 
> > > and miserable. I found myself in an increasing spiral of 
> > > justifications, for everything. My mind was working overtime 
to 
> > > explain to itself what was going on, and not doing a great 
job. 
> My 
> > > super sensory experiences grew so common that I stopped doing 
the 
> > > Siddhis. There grew an increasing dissonance between the 
momentum 
> of 
> > > expansion of my awareness created by my continued practice of 
TM, 
> > > and my ability to integrate it into daily activity; where was 
the 
> > > bliss, the serenity, the increased success? To any outside 
> observer 
> > > I appeared normal enough, but inside was turmoil.
> > > 
> > > The fourth paradigm came about instantly, and was a far 
greater 
> > > transformation than all of the other three combined. After 
> > > continuing the third phase of poorly integrated expansion for  
> > > twenty-plus years, with my mind madly scrambling to keep up 
and 
> > > feeling near total exhaustion emotionally as the process 
became 
> more 
> > > and more intense, trying to integrate what my world had become 
in 
> > > terms of my self identity and my mental picture of it, one 
> morning I 
> > > could take no more, and I just completely gave up. As if a 
> carefully 
> > > built and maintained, incredibly intricate, ever vigilant 
answer-
> for-
> > > everything house of cards within me just crumbled, in an 
instant, 
> > > and what I was crumbled with it. All my false identity and 
> > > justifications just vanished in the blink of an eye. Self 
> > > evaporation.
> > > 
> > > I always tied enlightenment, whether understood to be always 
> present 
> > > or found along a longer road, to be the inner and outer 
> expression 
> > > of lasting freedom. And this is where I find myself after that 
> final 
> > > collapse a couple of years ago. Is it CC or GC or UC or BC or 
KC? 
> I 
> > > don't know, nor am I much concerned with that. I had a dream 
over 
> > > the weekend where I was watching something surrealistic going 
on 
> > > between two people concerning six foot paper clips (?) in my 
> dream. 
> > > I turned to the person next to me and said, "Why are they 
doing 
> > > that?", to which my dream companion replied, "Because you are 
> > > dreaming." "Oh...riiight...", I replied.
> > > 
> > > So where is enlightenment now? It is everywhere, and I learn 
more 
> of 
> > > it every single day. So it exists as a permanence on the one 
> hand, 
> > > and on the other, I am always on my way to find more of it.
> > > >>>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To subscribe, send a message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Or go to: 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> and click 'Join This Group!' 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>


Reply via email to