That is one world class obsession! To reread, catergorize and count 167 Judy Stein posts! The mere scope is mind boggling. More power to you -- if thats what floats your dingy.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And speaking of tendencies, let's look at a few > of them you were so quick to dismiss earlier today > about yourself. You claimed that my suggestion that > the lion's share of what you bring to this group > is negativity and putdowns was falsity or outright > lying on my part. Well, honey, let's "run the numbers" > for the last few weeks of your participation here on > FFL, shall we? > > In the 30 days since March 19, 2007 (the first day > that the five-post rule went into effect), you have > made 167 posts. Here's the breakdown of what those > posts "contributed" to Fairfield Life: > > Positive: > * Discussing a topic calmly, without rancor, and > without insults -- 21 > * Being funny and lighthearted and enjoyable -- 2 > > Neither Positive Nor Negative: > * Questions about the five-post rule itself -- 8 > * Reposting someone else's thoughts and ideas, > without comment - 15 > > Negative: > * Ragging on the five-post rule itself -- 12 > * Ragging on Rick (at least one slam against > him in the post) -- 14 > * Ragging on Vaj (at least one slam against > him in the post) -- 13 > * Ragging on Curtis (at least one slam against > him in the post) -- 16 > * Ragging on Barry (at least one slam against > him in the post) -- 29 > * Ragging on other FFL posters (at least one > slam against someone) -- 22 > * Ragging on politicians/public figures (at > least one slam in the post) -- 15 > > Honey, you've been on the rag. > > Physician, heal thyself. When you can go a > week without dumping on someone like Curtis > because you're feeling shitty about yourself > and have to project it onto someone else, on > that day I will have some modicum of respect > for you. Not until. >
