--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> 
> <big snip>
> 
> > Recruit
> > them from kids who grew up on the myths created by people
> > like Gandhi or Buddha or Martin Luther King, and who can
> > thus think of more than two solutions to the problems of
> > the world. 
> 
> Why the Buddha? Buddha wasn't shot, he just died of poisoned meat.
>
Do you mean "meat gone bad", that is rancid, spoiled, and thus
food-poisoning? Or do you mean someone put poison in his meat?

I can't find reference to this in a search. I did find that he ate
meat, even though many buddhist sects don't.

"when lays community specifically purchase meat for consumption of
monks and nuns, permissibility of meat eating differ among different
Buddhist sects. Theravada Pali Cannon record instance of Buddha eating
meat which were specifically purchased for Buddha. Acceptance of
authenticity of Pali Sutta differ within Mahayana sects and Mahayana
sutras does not record Buddha eating meat. While no Mahayana sects
consider Pali sutras to be inauthentic, Chinese Buddhist sects tend to
consider this particular part of writing in Pali suttas to be false.
Japanese Buddhist sects generally accept that Buddha ate meat."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_cuisine

Soem will say its my limitations, but somehow I prefer saints (and
their wisdom) who don't eat meat. 

One story is that SBS died of food poisoning. If Buddha did too, its
an odd and interesting trend among saints, and in Buddha's case an
avatar (per some).

Hard to fathom karma, much less the karma and taking on of collective
karma of saints. It just seems an odd way for Buddha to go -- eating
meat. Even that may be moral tale. 

Then again, animal sacrafice was an integral part of many religions in
theri pre-modern forms. In pre 70AD judiasm, before destruction of the
temple, sacrafices were done right in the temple. I guess eating the
prasad of sacrafice has a logic. If one gets over the hurdle of the
idea that killing animals is a way to please god and atone for sins. 

And in the modern age, eating meat, and supporting the whole caged
meat industry complex, is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions
-- methane in particular. Global warming doesn't seem to be a divine
reward for righteous activity.



Reply via email to