--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of mainstream20016 > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 3:17 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Overposting?- Thank you, Rick, for setting > limits - > > > > Rick, > Thank you for limiting the number of FFL posts to 5 per day per FFL > contributor. I > have observed FFL since its 2001 beginning, and I enjoy visiting FFL more > now than before > the limits because the content of posts is now more focused, and I think the > tone of the > exchanges between various persons of different perspectives has become more > respectful. > Or so it seems.... > I hope the limiting process is sufficiently automated. I enjoy seeing you > step into the > ring, as though you're the referee at a boxing match, to inform combatants > about the > limits. But I wonder how you're holding up in that role. If the limit > monitoring process is > less automated than it might be, I hope it can become automated and ease the > demand on > your time and attention. In any event, THANK YOU, RICK for 5 post / day / > contributor > limit. > -mainstream > > It's pretty easy to monitor, because as long as Yahoo doesn't send me > multiple emails, I can easily sort my FFL folder in Outlook by author and > see a tally of how many posts each person has done. Everyone is respectful > of the limits, except Shemp, who posted 45 times this week while I wasn't > paying attention. So I put him on moderated status. Next week he will be > limited to 25. >
I was on affirmative action status this week, so I was entitled to 50.
