--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of mainstream20016
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 3:17 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Overposting?- Thank you, Rick, for 
setting
> limits -
> 
>  
> 
> Rick,
> Thank you for limiting the number of FFL posts to 5 per day per FFL
> contributor. I 
> have observed FFL since its 2001 beginning, and I enjoy visiting 
FFL more
> now than before 
> the limits because the content of posts is now more focused, and I 
think the
> tone of the 
> exchanges between various persons of different perspectives has 
become more
> respectful. 
> Or so it seems.... 
> I hope the limiting process is sufficiently automated. I enjoy 
seeing you
> step into the 
> ring, as though you're the referee at a boxing match, to inform 
combatants
> about the 
> limits. But I wonder how you're holding up in that role. If the 
limit
> monitoring process is 
> less automated than it might be, I hope it can become automated and 
ease the
> demand on 
> your time and attention. In any event, THANK YOU, RICK for 5 post / 
day /
> contributor 
> limit. 
> -mainstream
> 
> It's pretty easy to monitor, because as long as Yahoo doesn't send 
me
> multiple emails, I can easily sort my FFL folder in Outlook by 
author and
> see a tally of how many posts each person has done. Everyone is 
respectful
> of the limits, except Shemp, who posted 45 times this week while I 
wasn't
> paying attention. So I put him on moderated status. Next week he 
will be
> limited to 25.
>


I was on affirmative action status this week, so I was entitled to 50.

Reply via email to