--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > TurquoiseB wrote: > > > I would never be so silly as to believe that there > > > was such a thing as "one truth," let alone try to > > > express it. I'll leave that to you... > > > > So, the "one truth" for you, Barry, is that it's silly > > to believe that anyone else would have a "one truth" > > let alone try to express it. > > Yes, I too was kind of laughing at how easily we can take an > Eclectic Understanding and apply it in a Fundamentalist manner! :-)
I should point out that nowhere above do I suggest that *Edg* shouldn't pursue his quest for "one truth." He might be able to stumble on one, and might even be able to express it in such a way that it would be "grokable" by everyone. For me, given my beliefs, such an exercise *would* be silly. I've said as much here many times. And then Edg pretty much demanded that I do so anyway. He even qualified it by saying that it should be an "ultimate one truth." I declined. But I wait with 'bated breath to hear *his* "one truth." Or yours, Rory, should you wish to attempt one. Or anyone else who might wish to propose one. For all of you, such an exercise might *not* be silly. For me, it would be, so I won't be invited *or* badgered into it. That's all.
