"your universe doesn't interfere with mine" - I find it does! Or, even if "you" are just in MY universe, how come then I can't get rid of you, if I want to. (nb YOU here stands for anything - eg suffering etc). If I create my universe then it's gone "out of control", like in a scary SciFi movie.
But there is an interesting book by Chopra on this whole subject - nice chapters too on all the quantum physics talked about by Hagelin etc.. http://www.beliefnet.com/story/202/story_20289_1.html --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "suziezuzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I figured out the unified field theory. It works like this. The > universe that you see is a creation of your own consciousness, you > created it, everything out there. The reason why your universe > doesn't interfere with mine is for the same reason that two > flashlight beams of light crossing one another don't interfere with > each other, the beam of light isn't effected by the other. I believe > that the order of creation is: consciousness, then light, and then > the forces, which in my opinion are all variations of light. Einstein > discovered that time and space change, the speed of light remaining > constant, that mass-light speed was equivalent to E or energy. I > believe that light, being the first expression from consciousness is > the constant for all the forces that follow, gravity, > electromagnetism, strong, weak, etc., all being variations on light > itself. It's consciousness that gives light it's constant. > Consciousness first creates light (and god said, "let there be > light") As the first of consciousness' creation, the universe is pure > light. And then with an innate desire within consciousness' to create > a single universe with its galaxies, stars and solar systems, light > then negates itself into expressions of matter, gravity, > electromagnetic, weak and strong forces. But in the end, it's our > creation, so we need to incorporate the creator and the creation. To > view the creation as separate from the creator always falls short. > The physics would have to show how light can transform itself into > gravity, electromagnetism, strong and weak forces which deal with sub > atomic particles. And then infer that light came from consciousness. > And why is that? Because in the end, whose consciousness is it that > ponders its creation? >
