Hi Michael,

Looking at your Blog Post definition, I think that the only field not
already in the dmNews type is PingURL. The Blog Link is also much like a
dmLink. It may well be worth extending or cloning some of the core custom
types to save some time - I've done that in the past, and found it a pretty
quick process.


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Britton, Michael (NIH/NIEHS)
Sent: Saturday, 3 December 2005 12:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: Web log custom type?


It would allow authors to enter blog posts and have them display in
standard blog format via display rules. It would include a comment
management utility.

Fields are so numerous I've started to wonder if I should a) break it up
into distinct entries and comments custom types, or b) extend dmNews.
This is a larger project than I expected, hence my reluctance to
actually begin!
 
Custom Type(s) *************************
 
Blog Posts
1. Entry text
2. Ping URL(s)
3. Date added
4. Date Modified
5. Entry title
6. Entry Author
7. Status
8. Expiration date
9. Objectid
10. Entry file
 
Blog Comments
1. Date Added
2. Comment text
3. Comment author
4. Comment title
5. Comment entry id (fk)
6. Objectid

Blog Links (resources)
1. Resource title
2. Resource link

Display Rules **************************

Entries
1. Bulleted list
2. Detailed
3. RSS

Comments
1. Bulleted list
2. Detailed

Links
1. Bulleted list
2. Detailed
________________________________

From: modius (sent by Nabble.com) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 2:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: Web log custom type?



        Mike Britton wrote:
        I'm entertaining the idea of building a web log custom type.
Before I 
        do this, I want to make sure no one else has done it.  Has
anyone? 

Whats it do exactly? 

-- geoff 
http://www.daemon.com.au/ 

________________________________

Sent from the FarCry - Dev
<http://www.nabble.com/Web-log-custom-type--t579173c621.html#a1578742>
forum at Nabble.com. 

Reply via email to