OK... what about FourQ? What version of that should I grab?
On 12/20/05, Geoff Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Absolutely do *not* get a snapshot of HEAD. HEAD is unstable at the > moment and does not yet have all the fixes in 3.0.1 merged. > > You need either the specific stable build (p300_b108) or the p300 branch > (which is actually pretty stable just now). > > -- geoff > http://www.daemon.com.au/ > > > Kay Smoljak wrote: > > >Geoff, > > > >I grabbed what was in the HEAD branch this morning - is that the > >latest version or should I get the b108 tag specifically? > > > >Thanks, > >K. > > > > > >On 12/20/05, Geoff Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>This is a known issue with 3.0 on MS SQL. I've added this as a ticket > >>for the release notes here: > >>http://bugs.farcrycms.org:8080/browse/FC-438 > >> > >>You need the latest cut of the code base. The current release candidate > >>for 3.0.1 fixes this and is available from CVS using the following tag: > >>p300_b108 > >> > >>Hope that helps, > >> > >>-- geoff > >>http://www.daemon.com.au/ > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content > filtering. > http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg > > > -- Kay Smoljak http://kay.zombiecoder.com/
