Scott Talsma wrote:
 I was that there used to be a dedicated website for fourQ, which
 stimulates a few questions.
 -Is anyone else using fourQ for projects outside of farcry?

Well everything I was using it for has gone into farcry.

 -Is there any architectural documentation regarding how it is
 conceptually put together? I was that daemon was in the process of
 overhauling it, making it theoretically easier to plug in just about
 any database, so I am assuming that work is still being done here,
 and that a master plan exists?

Hmm.. you might check this graphic put together by Josef in our dev team -- it explains a lot i think:
http://bugs.farcrycms.org:8080/confluence/display/FCDEV30/DATA+Access+in+FARCRY

Shows the DAO model for fourq and the inheritence model for content types in general.

 -Is there anyway of decoupling fourQ from the reliance on the farcry
 mapping?

I'm sure there is -- its just folks here being lazy as we no longer use the solution outside of the context of FarCry.

FourQ was written at the time of the NEO alpha when we were really just getting an understanding of how CFCs were going to turn out. The modifications in 6.1 have really led to a maturing of this area of CFC patterns and approach. If I could rewrite the thing from scratch architecturally I probably would but it works well, and there are plenty of other things to refactor before we get into that :)

Best regards,

-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/

 Scott Talsma CTO echo.eleven 404.845.3458

 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff Bowers Sent:
 Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:00 PM To: [email protected]
 Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: fourQ issue--cached object being returned
 after update


 Rather than adding an additional argument to getData() perhaps we
 need to add something to setData() that refreshes that cache. What
 do people think?

 -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/

 Scott wrote:


--
Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content 
filtering.
http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg


Reply via email to