Geoff Bowers wrote: > Yeah.. we're always debating whether certain lists should be LI or DD/DT based.
I've tried to find some form of best practice via the web standards group (to no avail) but seriously I think the DL method (as per Mollio) is the best implementation for result lists; it allows for an arbitrary number of DT/DD entities - it also fits in very nicely with the extended metadata information via your displaysearchresult.cfm template technique. Cheers David -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff Bowers Sent: Friday, 19 May 2006 5:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: Using Friendly URLs in Search results David Whiterod wrote: > Are your displaysearchresult.cfm templates doing a getData operation > on each returned object to get the extended metadata (author etc)? > Does this have performance implications (In 3.0.1 does fourq instance > cache up running?) Yeah there is a getdata() per result.. so displaying 10 results will result in 10 additional lookups for the page.. but its not that much of a performance hog. 3.1 will have the objectbroker technology in place which should be ideal for quashing these sorts of db-lookup hungry activities. >> We're using UL/LI rather than DL/DT/DD with H3 for the title. > > I saw the DL/DT/DD combo in Mollio - I think this is a really good use > of those tags. Yeah.. we're always debating whether certain lists should be LI or DD/DT based. -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ -- Message protected by MailGuard: e-mail anti-virus, anti-spam and content filtering. http://www.mailguard.com.au/mg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
