I will look into it... Oh and thanks by the way i've fixed many problems reading your posts. We also purchased a full license for the jwplayer when the plugin came out.
On Apr 24, 5:20 pm, modius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 25, 8:11 am, Selfprodigy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would upgrade except this site is for a rather large company > > (100million plus per year) I'm a full time employee there, and i've > > been working on this for 3 weeks. I've been able to configure farcry > > to meet almost all the demands they need. At this point upgrading to a > > new system im totally unfamiliar with doesn't practical. > > Well its pretty much the same as 4.0, but with a new security model > and extra goodness :) The upgrade is push-button simple for vanilla > sites. But heh, if you're stuck on 4.0 for the moment its not a bad > platform. > > > With this contact page best i can figure is for some reason it's > > bypassing custom contact.cfm page. At this point i dont care about > > the validation i can fix that later i just need it to email. > > I don't know -- sounds like the form action. Perhaps just put > nothing. > > In any event the way the contact us form sample is approached in the > 5.0 release is something you can do in 4.0. You may even be able to > copy the code without change. the _contact.cfm is pretty old school > example that pre-dates the ease of formtools -- its still a valid > approach. We just tend not to use "includes" for anything these days. > > Best regards, > > -- geoffhttp://www.daemon.com.au/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
