Chris, Let me first assume that you are using friendly URL’s. If so then maybe the following will help you, it worked for me.
On a page url.path would equal /go/sales/widgets/.... or /go/support/ widgets/.... etc. <cfset section = listGetAt(url.path,2,"/")> will get either “sales” or “support” depending on what page is being displayed. You can then use this in your container names to have a container for sales to pull support content and vice versa. e.g. <con:container label="#section#" defaultMirrorLabel="#section# Container"> Dynamic container naming is very powerful. Chris. On Sep 23, 6:25 pm, Chris Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looking to get some ideas on using containers/rules. > > I have "sales" and "support" nav nodes that are basically mirrors of > eachother. in that that have the same "structure". For example, under > sales there are product sections Widgets (A,B,C,D) Wodgets (A,B,C,D) > Wadgets (A,B,C,D) and under support there would be resources specific > to the products under Widgets, Wodgets, Wadgets. > > I am usign a 3 column layout in both sections. > > I'd like to have a shared container under "Widgets" sales that links > to Widgets support and vice versa. And under support, I might have a > container/rule that have popular "Widget" support links (dmfiles, > dmhtmls ,etc). > > What I would like to NOT do is have to have a displayPageWidgetSales, > displayPageWidgetSupport since this would basically be giving me 6 > displayPage templates that are all essintially the same wit hthe > exception of the shared container resource. > > My thinking is to try and dynamically assign the reflection for the > container based on the navid. This, if I am thinking clearly would > allow me to have a single displayPage webskin, and the containers > could be managed from the web top using publishing rules specific to > the container. > > the displayPage webskin could have a second "generic" container for > rules that might not apply across the board. > > Anyone doing anything like this? Anyone have suggestions to achive the > effect? maybe I am missing something thats easier? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
