The overview pages were revised quite a bit in 6. There should be a "PERMISSIONS User Access" button on the left. If there isn't, that's a bug.
Blair On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:30 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to do the same for dmNews ( > https://farcry.jira.com/wiki/display/FCDEV50/Object+specific+permissions). > What I need is to make some of the dmNews content only accessible to the > members. Other news contents will be accessible to public & members. > > I have created /myproject/packages/types/farBarnacle.cfc as follows: > > <cfcomponent displayname="Barnacle" hint="Used to grant an item specific > permissions." extends="farcry.core.packages.types.farBarnacle" > output="false"> > <cfproperty name="referenceid" type="uuid" default="" hint="The object > this barnacle is attached to" > ftSeq="3" ftFieldset="" ftLabel="Object" > ftType="uuid" ftJoin="dmNavigation,dmNews" /> > > </cfcomponent> > > At step 2, I highlighted the "Navigation and News". Then reloaded the > security as mentioned at step 3. My problem is step 4 though. I cannot see > the "Miscellaneous -> Manage permissions". I am on Farcry 6-0-7. > > Is this approach above only for FC 5.x? > > Thanks > > Tunç > > On 5 Oct 2010, at 23:27, Blair McKenzie wrote: > > For extending object specific permissions to your own types: > https://farcry.jira.com/wiki/display/FCDEV50/Object+specific+permissions > > Blair > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Scott Mebberson > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hey Geoff, >> >> Thanks for that. With the new setup, where would the best place to put >> that view controller logic? I'm guessing an overridden method in my >> custom object, which extends farcry.core.packages.types.types. >> >> I checked out getDisplay but that doesn't seem to be executed. So I'm >> thinking getView would be the place to put it? >> >> cheers, >> Scott. >> >> On Oct 5, 9:48 pm, modius <[email protected]> wrote: >> > You'd only be looking at farBarnacle if you were looking at tree-based >> > content types that you wanted to bind to the inheritance model on the >> > tree. Otherwise you might as well just look at the ownership id of the >> > individual content instance -- and that would be pretty >> > straightforward. >> > >> > You can list objects that match the same ownership id and also put a >> > check on the edit handler to block users who don't have a matching >> > ownership id. >> > >> > Hope that helps, >> > >> > --geoffhttp://www.daemon.com.au/ >> > >> > On Oct 5, 10:25 pm, Scott Mebberson <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > I've been looking into the new security stuff in application.security. >> > > I've been trying to work out how to secure an object, specific to user >> > > and permission. For example, I'd like userA to have the ObjectView >> > > permission for a particular object, but I don't want userB to have the >> > > ObjectView permission for the same object. >> > >> > > It looks like application.security.checkPermission is what I'm looking >> > > for, but I don't want to secure based on roles alone, but be as >> > > specific as the user itself. >> > >> > > I get the feeling this isn't possible? Any ideas on what the best way >> > > to approach the above is? >> > >> > > I'm creating a custom editing interface, and this stuff has nothing to >> > > do with formtools or FarCry admin. I basically want to secure the >> > > editing interface for objects, such that only the owner can view the >> > > editing interface for the objects they own. Is there a way to >> > > elegantly achieve what I want using the ownedby property of >> > > farBarnacle? >> >> -- >> You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google >> group. >> To post, email: [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, email: >> [email protected]<farcry-dev%[email protected]> >> For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev >> -------------------------------- >> Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry >> > > > -- > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google > group. > To post, email: [email protected] > To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] > For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev > -------------------------------- > Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry > > > -- > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google > group. > To post, email: [email protected] > To unsubscribe, email: > [email protected]<farcry-dev%[email protected]> > For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev > -------------------------------- > Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry > -- You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
