It is an awesome feature, but forcing this functionality on all clients for all their existing image use is probably a bad idea.
Might I propose just making it a new setting/switch that a developer can chose to activate per cfproperty? Example: <cfproperty type="image" ftType="enhancedImage" .../> I think making it an ftType value is probably the better option because the type is still image, but the formtools have changed. Thoughts? -- Jeff Coughlin On Dec 6, 2010, at 18:01, Geoffrey Bowers wrote: > On 06/12/2010, at 3:50 AM, Sean Coyne wrote: >> I'm not sure p600 is the best place for this. It doesn't seem quite >> ready for prime time yet. > > A plugin would require a new repo, and we're definitely replacing the image > formtool as soon as things are stable. Trunk has a lot of very significant > changes, and we don't want to confuse the issues if we can help it. > > Although its not ideal, the internal verdict at Daemon HQ is that we'll > soldier on trying to get the new feature set nailed in p600. If we find > ourselves blocking other maintenance patches we will simply revert the image > formtool in the maintenance branch. As it stands we don't have any major > maintenance patches in the pipeline, so hopefully we can get the new image > features rock solid before then. > > Keep on testing mighty testers! > > -- geoff > http://www.daemon.com.au/ > skype. gb.daemon > > -- > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. > To post, email: [email protected] > To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] > For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev > -------------------------------- > Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -- You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
