My point/question was if there was a cfmx7 version coming out soon, you would have two major release coming out within a short period of time. Guess this is not an issue for an open source project - only when you have to pay for major releases upgrades.
On 8/24/05, Geoff Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Mercer wrote:
> How much work will be reqired to get any custom components to have the
> new PLP UI and workflow (eg file and images)?
> If it is not a matter of dropping 2.3.x custom components into a 2.4.x
> site, then it probably should be a v3
The pre-existing PLP (Wizard) and Generic Admin code has been
preserved.. so any existing custom types should work as before -- albeit
not looking as schmick.
> How far away is v3 - the cfmx7 version?
> How does Daeomon feel about releasing V3 and then ?months? releasing v4?
There's not really a CF7 version per se. The only thing we've decided
on is making sure CF7 is not a *requirement* for core code. You can
certainly use CF7 specific code for your own implementation; Flash Forms
and so on. We're just not using those features in the core code.
Is there anything in particular you'd be looking for in a CF7 specific
version of FarCry that can't already be accommodated with the
extensibility options in the code base?
-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/
---
You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
--- You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
