>> http://www.accessgrid.org/
>
> I don't see more then 10 participants (ie video feeds) on the pictures

hello oliver

right , because it does NOT scale, quote from an IETF chair:

>>> The problem with Access Grid or the
>>> commercial alternatives is  the extreme
>>> difficulty of running an effective remote meeting with
>>> more than a very small number (4 or 5) of participating
>>> sites. So for a design team meeting it's fine, but for a
>>> WG meeting I think you'd be quite disappointed.


> on that site. Remember that you need the CPU power to decode all of
> these video feeds and you need the screen real-estate to show them.

i dont say that you need to open 50 videos at one time i am talking
about the ability to open as much as my download rate . allows ;)


>>> My knowledge of IPv6 is very limited because not a single
>>> commercial ISP offers IPv6 in my country.
>>
>> What about <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunnel_broker>  ?
>
> Even then, they have terrible ping up here...

right 326ms is a bit slow, for a conference , but i am sure it could  
be inproved

traceroute6 to www.kame.net (2001:200::8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085) from
2001:6f8:1051::20d:93ff:fe79:f1e, 30 hops max, 12 byte packets
  1  2001:6f8:1051::  4.202 ms  0.451 ms  0.34 ms
  2  gw-1942.ham-01.de.sixxs.net  42.498 ms  39.153 ms  40.408 ms
  3  vl101.cr21.isham.de.easynet.net  39.451 ms  40.709 ms  40.01 ms
  4  ge1-3.br2.isham.de.easynet.net  41.56 ms  38.803 ms  38.912 ms
  5  2001:6f8:1::87:86:71:240  145.883 ms  40.533 ms  203.5 ms
  6  2001:6f8:1::86:87:77:64  51.899 ms  54.406 ms  52.77 ms
  7  2001:6f8:1::87:86:77:68  232.312 ms  170.219 ms  217.474 ms
  8  2001:6f8:1::87:86:77:28  62.568 ms  64.38 ms  63.745 ms
  9  2001:6f8:1::87:86:71:137  85.806 ms  62.073 ms  62.694 ms
10  ge-0.linx.londen03.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net  64.478 ms  63.645 ms  64.283  
ms
11  as-0.r20.nycmny01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net  143.741 ms  136.32 ms   
141.073 ms
12  as-2.r21.sttlwa01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net  223.901 ms  222.631 ms   
217.516 ms
13  as-2.r21.osakjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net  311.102 ms  316.01 ms   
310.763 ms
14  ae-4.r21.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net  334.897 ms  326.834 ms   
326.386 ms
15  xe-4-1.a15.tokyjp01.jp.ra.gin.ntt.net  341.299 ms  317.613 ms   
322.203 ms
16  ge-8-2.a15.tokyjp01.jp.ra.gin.ntt.net  321.053 ms  311.518 ms   
328.712 ms
17  ve44.foundry6.otemachi.wide.ad.jp  330.04 ms  313.828 ms  322.922 ms
18  ve42.foundry4.nezu.wide.ad.jp  327.78 ms  321.354 ms  320.373 ms
19  ve45.nec2.yagami.wide.ad.jp  323.335 ms  327.745 ms  331.35 ms
20  lo0.alaxala1.k2.wide.ad.jp  320.937 ms  311.647 ms  320.016 ms
21  orange.kame.net  326.383 ms  319.723 ms  326.75 ms

> But my point is mostly, if North American ISPs don't believe IPv6  
> matters, then it doesn't matter.


Its seems they undertstands the importance here in  europe,   ;)
http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/ipv6/docs/european_day/comm-ipv6-final_en.pdf

greetings

Marc

P.S. a french isp called free.fr offers "native ipv6 out of the box "
--
Think glocally.  Act confused.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Farsight-devel mailing list
Farsight-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/farsight-devel

Reply via email to