Horms wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be a particularly strong reason to create
> and entirely new type for dvt, which is just an unsigned int.
> In fact, I think it is a lot clearer just to use unigned directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   
Makes sense. Tested and working fine. Ack.

Thanks
-Sachin

> Index: kexec-tools-testing/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c
> ===================================================================
> --- kexec-tools-testing.orig/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c 2006-12-08 
> 12:40:08.000000000 +0900
> +++ kexec-tools-testing/kexec/arch/ppc64/fs2dt.c      2006-12-08 
> 12:41:05.000000000 +0900
> @@ -57,16 +57,15 @@
>   

_______________________________________________
fastboot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot

Reply via email to