On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 05:36:25PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> 
> I would focus on getting kexec to work properly first if I were you.
> And when that is in place I would spend time on fixing up kdump. The
> kdump chain is pretty complex, and the kexec user space code is pretty
> hairy. So after fixing up kexec you need to make sure the kdump chain
> works. This is very similar to the work that we have been doing with
> out Xen port.
> 
> Like I said - the kdump chain is pretty complex, but I've found myself
> spending way too much time on the kexec user space tool itself. Simon,
> I and other people on the list have lately been working on cleaning up
> the code base - so again - I strongly recommend you to build on that
> code.

Hi Larry,

After porting and reporting kexec to xen several times
on several architectures, my advice is to get UP (maxcpus=1 is fine)
kexec working first. Once thats working build up SMP and kdump support
like Magnus suggests.

-- 
Horms
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/

_______________________________________________
fastboot mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot

Reply via email to