On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Albert Graef <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Stéphane Letz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> How is LLVM and clang packaged on those systems?
>
> As I said, the executables are under /usr/bin.

To be more precise: Ubuntu has the LLVM toolchain in the proper LLVM
libdir, but clang goes under /usr/bin. Arch has both under /usr/bin,
which is also the layout mandated by upstream (except that the install
prefix is /usr instead of the default /usr/local).

I can see why one would want clang to live in the proper LLVM libdir
as well, but that's not how it is right now. And until the LLVM dev
team changes the layout (unlikely), I don't expect the Linux and *BSD
packaging to do it the MacPorts way any time soon.

-- 
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email:  [email protected]
WWW:    https://plus.google.com/111193356966611167754

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Faudiostream-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-devel

Reply via email to