Hi IOhannes, > Le 29 mai 2017 à 21:04, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at> a écrit : > > ola, > > Debian/stretch is to be released in about 2 weeks, and after that I > would like to switch the Debian packages from faust to faust2. > > i'm not sure I understand the release model though: > the faust homepage just refers to the github page, and the github page > has only a single faust2 release (`v2-0-a49`). > otoh, the build-system (/Makefile) currently has `2.0.a72`. > but, currently there are 5 commits (5ba81162..f5c3cc43) including one > git-merge, that all have the 2.0.a72 version. > > so my questions are: > is v2.0.a49 the last official faust2 release, and a50..a72 are only
Well v2.0.a51 is the latest version on Source Forge : https://sourceforge.net/projects/faudiostream/files/ > intermediate versions ("unstable")? > or, did you forget to tag releases? or to push the tags? > or, are there no official releases at all, and faust2 should be > considered "rolling", with the current HEAD always supposedly being in a > "stable" state? We change the version number each time something important changes. We did not add any tag since v2.0.a51. > > for the Debian packages I would prefer, if there was release-like > tarball that i could download (rather than having to check, whether the > current HEAD really is in a working state…) So we’ll tag when we consider a «rolling » version is stable enough, and you could start from this tag to do the packaging yes? Stéphane ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Faudiostream-devel mailing list Faudiostream-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-devel
