Done.

Stéphane

> Le 12 févr. 2021 à 14:57, Till Bovermann <t...@taukodesign.fi> a écrit :
> 
> Dear Stéphane, all,
> 
> (to be super-nit-picky...)
> 
> At the given link [1], it states that 
> 
>       \forall t \in |N, y(t) = 0.95
> 
> shouldn't that be 
> 
>       \forall t \in |N^+, y(t) = 0.95
> 
> 
> Note the plus sign, which excludes negative t's for which y(t) = 0.
> This seems to me a rather important element of the faust language (e.g. used 
> in the famous "dirac" implementation `d = 1-1;')
> 
> cheers
>       Till
> 
> 
> 
> [1]  https://faustdoc.grame.fr/manual/syntax/#numbers
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 8. Feb 2021, at 19:33, Stéphane Letz <l...@grame.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> The ‘pow' operation computed on integer arguments was indeed incorrect at 
>> compile time. Should be fixed in 2.30.12 version on master-dev.
>> 
>> The documentation has been completed for numbers: 
>> https://faustdoc.grame.fr/manual/syntax/#numbers
>> 
>> Stéphane  
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 8 févr. 2021 à 00:11, Dario Sanfilippo <sanfilippo.da...@gmail.com> a 
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>> Thanks, Oleg. And sorry if I was a little lazy. :-)
>>> 
>>> I see that 2^32 gives 4.2949673e+09 as well; shouldn't we have the same 
>>> behaviour between a signal and its delayed version?
>>> 
>>> Dario
>>> 
>>> On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 20:26, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On 02/07, Dario Sanfilippo wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Other than that, can you tell why -2 or 2 is producing -inf?
>>> 
>>> Runtime integer overflow, I guess. Why didn't you try to simplify
>>> your code ? ;)
>>> 
>>> Consider
>>> 
>>>       process = 2.0', 2' : par( i, 2, ^(32));
>>> 
>>> output:
>>> 
>>>       0                       0
>>>       4.2949673e+09           0
>>>       ...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> this means that
>>> 
>>>       process = 2.0', 2' : par( i, 2, 1/^(32));
>>> 
>>> outputs
>>> 
>>>       inf                     inf
>>>       2.32830644e-10          inf
>>>       ...
>>> 
>>> Oleg.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Dr Dario Sanfilippo
>>> http://dariosanfilippo.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Faudiostream-users mailing list
>>> Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Faudiostream-users mailing list
>> Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
> 



_______________________________________________
Faudiostream-users mailing list
Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users

Reply via email to