"Tim Cowlishaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] and the granting of a license should cause no > problems for free culturalists, as the granting of such a license by > default to anyone and everyone is implicit in any free culture > license (copyleft / sharealike clauses excepted).
AIUI, some of these sites require such a broad licence and permission to relicense that site owners can effectively subvert any copyleft they choose. Sourceforge/OSTG also seems to require a broad licence, but does it in a way that seems intended to iron out wrinkles like ambiguous licensing. That may be a better model, but IANAL and can't tell how workable the approach is. Thanks, -- MJ Ray - see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html North End, Lynn, Norfolk, England Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request _______________________________________________ fc-uk-discuss mailing list fc-uk-discuss@lists.okfn.org http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/fc-uk-discuss
