David Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Re: The iCommons Lab Report
Is this about http://icommons.org/newsletters/lab-report-octobernovember-2006/ ? > What is even weirder is the iCommons community council (iCCC) which > is open for nominations (good), but then selected by iCommons Board > which will make the final decision of the 9-13 iCCC members (not so > good - why the shifting number? what power will it have?). Also, isn't 13 rather large for useful work in one group, or is it expected that not all 13 will be active at once? (Most things I've suggest 7 is a good number for a group and not more than 11 but can I find a reference this morning? Can I heck.) [from code of conduct] > ยท iCommoners employ open and transparent governance and processes. I can't read http://icommons.org/ easily because of its poor CSS and the company registration number doesn't seem to be shown on the site. So I'll now test how open/transparent the process of getting those changes is... Regards, -- MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Somerset, England. Work/Laborejo: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ IRC/Jabber/SIP: on request/peteble _______________________________________________ fc-uk-discuss mailing list fc-uk-discuss@lists.okfn.org http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/fc-uk-discuss
