The libHBAAPI and libhbalinux .pc files are under /usr/lib64 so I used environment variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH to this directory and it helped to locate these files. The problem is with the lldpad. I succeed to perform : apt-get install lldpad I use rpm since it is in the INSTALL instructions The problem is that there is no .pc for it so I can't configure the env. variable PKG_CONFIG_PATH I also don't know what should be in LLDPAD_LIBS or LLDPAD_CFLAGS instead ... checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for HBAAPI... yes checking for LLDPAD... no configure: error: Package requirements (lldpad >= 0.9.43) were not met: No package 'lldpad' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LLDPAD_CFLAGS and LLDPAD_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Love, Robert W <[email protected]>wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:fcoe-devel- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Neil Horman > > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 10:02 AM > > To: Doron Kenneth > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] Installing fcoe-utils > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 02:14:51PM +0300, Doron Kenneth wrote: > > > I receive an error: unable to locate package lldpad-devel > > > > > Then contact your distribution maintainers to see where the lldpad-devel > > package is, or what its name is (lldpad-devel is the fedora name). > > > > Speaking of which, Why are you using rpm on Ubuntu? shouldn't you be > > using deb (or whatever Canonical tool replaces deb)? Or have they > > converted to rpm or something? > > I would guess that he's using rpm because it's part of the INSTALL > instructions, > which were written against Fedora. > > 1) Bootstrap, configure, make and make install > # ./bootstrap.sh > # rpm --eval "%configure" | sh > # make > # make install > > This was just a nice way to get the default options for './configure'. > > When I went to build fcoe-utils.git on Ubuntu I installed rpm (was > surprised it > was a package) and then continued with the instructions. Everything went > well until I ran into the lib64 vs lib issue. I looked at the output of > > rpm --eval "%configure" | sh > > on Ubuntu and the output seemed reasonable. I simply didn't have the time > to look into it at the time so I just symlinked around the problem. > > There is probably a 'deb' way to get those default configure options, but > I'd > have to spend some time looking into it. > > //Rob > _______________________________________________ fcoe-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/fcoe-devel
