On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 15:17 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 05/27/15 02:43, [email protected] wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 13:07 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > >> Please consider the following four patches for Linux kernel v4.2. I came > >> up with these patches while retesting the libfc code against the LIO > >> FCoE target driver: > > > > I'm reviewing now. > > > > Since these are in context of LIO so may be okay to push these through > > Nab if he is okay to accept these core libfc changes through his target > > tree and this time these shouldn't cause any conflict at scsi tree. > > > > I'm fine with that instead of pushing through scsi mailing list as we > > having been doing for any libfc/fcoe change, so if Nab doesn't pick them > > then you would need to post series again to scsi mailing list. > > Hello Vasu, > > Sorry if I wasn't clear enough in the cover letter of this patch series > but this series fixes issues that were discovered while testing the FCoE > initiator stack while it was communicating with the LIO FCoE target > driver. This is why I had sent these patches to you. >
I see, I misunderstood this before, so in this case revise series should go through scsi mailing list. Thanks Bart for patches. Vasu _______________________________________________ fcoe-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-fcoe.org/mailman/listinfo/fcoe-devel
