Eric Auer wrote:
Well, personally, I believe that if the programmer is dumb enough not to read the docs and perform the checks described in there, said programmer deserves it if his code fails... but, that's just my personal opinion ;-).Okay, I was announcing a QUESTION. Do you think it makes sense to simulate the TSC from DOS, even for DPMI ? We could for example return 1000000 * timer ticks (the common 40:[6c] value...) or even some more stupid value. Would that make sense??? Do you know of other "TSC-less CPU helpers"?I personally think that programs SHOULD first check for the existance of the TSC before using it, but, well... some programs just fail to be sane.
----------
list options/archives/etc.: http://www.topica.com/lists/fd-dev
unsubscribe: send blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@mail-archive.com
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bz8Rv5.bbRv4l.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================