Secure recovery is the way you let a user continue using their machine if they have lost their token or forgotten their password. We offer standard challenge/response recovery, plus web based self-help, administrator assisted, and with partners, voice based self help. The "Recovery" section of the admin guide details that.
the SSO we offer is only into Windows and networks - it's called "Windows Login" in our docs. It basically means the user can use the same creds as windows pre-boot. Our system captures and replays them so there's only ever one login, and then replicates them to every machine that user might want to use so if they turn a box on, they can login with their Windows creds pre-boot, even if they have never used that machine before. Of course if you change your password, rename your user account etc we can capture that. The distribution of the creds is of course up to the admin to decide. How do I feel we stack up against PS and Uti? well, that's really for you to decide, we have every feature they have that I can think of so on an apples for apples test we'll come out the same - it all depends if you like the features we have that they don't, like support for 16,000 users per machine, tokens, 32bit pre-boot, sync with AD etc. You may not know SafeBoot, but if you can be persuaded I'd of course advise you to test us. We run head to head with PS a lot and win, but, of course they will say that as well, and would be correct some of the time. I'm trying to be unbiased of course. Maybe you should call our office and get an eval and see for yourself? On Jul 3, 1:00 pm, "Shelton, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Simon, > > I have been doing some research on FDE solutions for an upcoming > initiative. One of the key features we are looking at in a solution is > an easy to use recovery system for field users. I see that your site > lists a Secure Recovery Mechanism as one of its features in SafeBoot 5.1 > for PC, can you elaborate a little on this feature. I cannot seem to > find any more details for this feature on the site. > > I am also interested in an SSO option. I do not see that > mentioned in any of the SafeBoot documentation, is this something that > may be introduced in a later version and if so, where does it show on > your roadmap? > > Currently other people in my organization are leaning towards > Pointsec and/or Utimaco. I also find what I have read on PGP's FDE > solution interesting and though they are smaller in this branch they do > have an outstanding record in encryption, not to mention Intel just made > a large investment into them showing confidence in their FDE product. > How do you feel your product weighs against these solutions? > > Bryan Glancey, > > I was mostly through this email when I saw your response. I > would also be interested in hearing your feedback on these features. I > have not yet done much research on Mobile Armor, but it is on my list. > The biggest question I have for Mobile Armor is that I do not see TPM > support listed as of yet, is this something we can expect to see any > time soon from your product? > > -Andrew > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of SafeBoot Simon > Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 9:47 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [FDE] Introduction... > > The big three WDE vendors are SafeBoot, Utimaco and Checkpoint. > > I'm biased towards SafeBoot because I'm the SafeBoot CTO. > > S. > > On Jul 3, 1:52 am, "Ivan Ezust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you have any questions re the big three WDE products I'll see if > I > > > can help with answers - obviously though (and to be utterly > > > transparent) I'm biased towards SafeBoot. > > > Simon, what three WDE products are you reffering to? And why are you > > biased towards Safeboot? > > _______________________________________________ > > FDE mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.xml-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/fde > > _______________________________________________ > FDE mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.xml-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/fde > > _______________________________________________ > FDE mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.xml-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/fde- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - _______________________________________________ FDE mailing list [email protected] http://www.xml-dev.com/mailman/listinfo/fde
