Yea I thought that alright (minority....) but the fact that the value of the property had diminished i felt warranted a discussion of how you can claim "On behalf of the Co" which it asked for under foss, but such a claim cant relate to decrease in value of shareholding!but yea i spoke about 205,fact it was a Q-P relationship n possible 213f so hopefully il pull through!!
On 2 Oct, 18:02, Jev <[email protected]> wrote: > This was going to be my last Q but decided to do Q1 last minute as I > didn't have time to work it out fully > > Thinking about it last night I would imagine it was s.205 oppression/ > disregard of members interests due to breach of duties and > additionally s.213(f) winding up on 'just and equitable grounds' > > To be honest I don't think the rule in Foss comes into it at all due > to that relating to minority shareholdings and in this situation it > was 50/50 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
