> For the "removed from C++14" features, are we documenting the former state, > or the state of the TS? That is, should [47] say <experimental/optional> now, > and should [3.8.1] say experimental/ for <optional> and <dynarray>?
My idea is that we are providing these recommendations for implementers who provide these features as specified in the 2013 CD, which of course is what the published revision of SD-6 is already doing. In some ways, this is a demonstration of our concern for stability. I don't know how often these specific recommendations will be implemented, but even if it's "never", I don't see that as a major problem. Someday there will (hopefully) be a TR that makes a more appropriate and popular recommendation. Clark _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
