> >> For N3928 Extending static_assert why not just bump up the date > on __cpp_static_assert? > > > > Yeah, that's definitely worth considering. The change is a > pretty minor > > tweak. (The recommendations I included for this were the ones > provided > > in N3928 -- thanks, Walter.) > > You're welcome, but I wish I had thought of Ed's suggestion. > Unless anyone objects, I recommend we adopt it, as (1) I like it > better than any of mine, and (2) doing so seems entirely > consistent with our document:
Since Walter has now repudiated his original proposals, I have deleted them from the draft. Thanks, Ed. Clark _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
