> On May 7, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Nelson, Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since the replies have been unanimously positive, I have thrown together a > draft of a paper for the post-meeting mailing. > > The bulk of it is just the descriptions from SD-6. Since Richard provided > most of that text, I am inclined to list him as co-author. But I added a > short introduction. > > Any comments?
Is the intent to get general feedback on the direction and then provide detailed wording if the direction is supported? John. > > Clark > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:features-bounces@open- >> std.org] On Behalf Of Nelson, Clark >> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 8:54 AM >> To: [email protected] ([email protected]) >> Subject: [SG10] __has_include and __has_cpp_attribute >> >> At the meeting last night I mentioned a thought that was eluding >> me at the >> moment. I have remembered what it was. >> >> We should consider adding __has_include and __has_cpp_attribute to >> the C++17 >> standard. Would anyone in SG10 have any concerns about that >> direction? >> >> -- >> Clark Nelson Chair, PL22.16 (ANSI C++ standard >> committee) >> Intel Corporation Chair, SG10 (C++ SG for feature-testing) >> [email protected] Chair, CPLEX (C SG for parallel language >> extensions) >> _______________________________________________ >> Features mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features > <predicates.html>_______________________________________________ > Features mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
