Several of my proposals have attracted no comments so far: __cpp_hex_float NEW __cpp_range_based_for BUMP __cpp_aggregate_bases NEW searcher design mistake no macro
I also want to specifically call attention to the hardware interference (cache-line) size proposal. The paper proposed: __cpp_lib_thread_hardware_interference_size But "thread" is not in the name proposed for the library, so it shouldn't be in the name of the macro either. (Apparently that was left over from the original proposal, in which this was provided by the thread class.) I think shortening that name is the obviously correct thing to do. Finally, I proposed making the new headers from the parallelism TS consistent with those from the fundamentals TS by adding macros (with specific values) defined within those headers: __cpp_lib_exception_list __cpp_lib_execution_policy If there is still no comment about any of these after this message, I will assume there is consensus support for all these proposals. Clark _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
