On 16 Mar 2016 6:14 p.m., "Nelson, Clark" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 03/14/2016 07:19 PM, Nelson, Clark wrote: > > > The only question that doesn't seem to have been settled yet is > > the > > > name of the macro for this-capture. The contenders seem to be: > > > > > > __cpp_capture_this > > > __cpp_capture_star_this > > > > > > Different people have spoken in favor of each. Let the argument > > begin > > > in earnest. > > > > It seems to me that _star_this is clearer, since we could already > > capture 'this'. > > Hmm. I was expecting rather more traffic on this topic. In particular, > John seemed to have a distinct preference, with rationale, for the > shorter, simpler name. > > Does no one else have a preference?
I'm fine with _star_this. The _this form seems odd, since we could always capture this. > > I haven't noticed discussion of the enum class change. Perhaps > > __cpp_enum_class_init? > > No, it wasn't discussed on the reflector, but the document does have > my rationale for omitting it. Is it flawed? It seems right to me. If you want to cope with older compilers, use a cast rather than list-initialization. > Clark > _______________________________________________ > Features mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
