> I can imagine that the macro would also be used by people who > replace the global operator new, and who would also replace the > aligned version if it were present.
That's a good point. It would also serve to indicate whether "std::align_val_t" were available as a type name. Would anyone else like to weigh in in one direction or the other? Clark _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
