The row for __cpp_lib_not_fn says the header is <function> which should be <functional>
The row for __cpp_lib_lock_guard_variadic says the header is <thread> but lock_guard is defined in <mutex> On 22 July 2016 at 20:06, Nelson, Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > Many thanks to Richard and Jonathan for their recent suggestions. > > I have posted a new draft: > > http://wiki.edg.com/pub/Wg21oulu/SG10/sd-6.html#recs.cpp17 > > It reflects most of the recent discussion. (I am not yet assuming we have > reached consensus about any/optional.) > > I have also done quite a bit of editorial work. > > One of the most significant changes is that I deleted most of the editorial > question marks indicating uncertainty about a proposal, calling attention > for > review. What I'd like people to do is take a close look at the whole of the > C++17 content. (The insertion indications are relative to the posted SD-6, > so everything from Jacksonville and Oulu is considered new.) > > What I have done instead is add an indication for every proposed macro for > which we don't yet have an example -- which is to say, for which we don't > yet have a rationale. I'd really like to get more examples -- but I don't > plan to do all the work of inventing them myself. > > -- > Clark Nelson Chair, PL22.16 (ANSI C++ standard committee) > Intel Corporation Chair, SG10 (C++ SG for feature-testing) > [email protected] Chair, CPLEX (C SG for parallel language > extensions) > _______________________________________________ > Features mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features >
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
