> On Dec 19, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0195r2.html > <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0195r2.html> > suggests a feature test macro of __cpp_variadic_using; the value would > presumably be 201611. Does that seem OK to everyone? >
I think it is okay. I think it is slightly odd as the change is to allow multiple names in a using-declaration, but the expected use case is for variadics. I’d also be okay with something like __cpp_multi_using. __cpp_variadic_using had more support when it was discussed in core, FWIW. John.
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
