Sure.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like to suggest we bump this to 201611 for P0512R0 (GCC uses 201606 for > P0091, which has somewhat different semantics). Seem OK? > > On 5 October 2016 at 10:18, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sounds good to me. >> >> On 5 Oct 2016 7:54 am, "Jason Merrill" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> We may not need a feature-test macro for the class template >>> placeholder feature, but we do need one for library vendors to guard >>> deduction guide declarations with. How about __cpp_deduction_guides? >>> >>> Jason >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Features mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features > > _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
