On 20 October 2017 at 21:23, Herb Sutter <[email protected]> wrote: > Furthermore, since we usually are in the business of standardizing things > that users otherwise have to write many times themselves: Has SG10 > considered actively defining a <std-forward-compat> header library that does > the above for all the things it can, the idea being that users who have to > target multiple implementations at various stages of conformance can include > <std-forward-compat> after all their standard library's own headers and > write their code more closely against the actual latest IS's std:: library, > without having to reinvent the above by hand (incompatibly on different > systems), as a transition tool to help encourage people to adopt the latest > standard? > > Nico, do you think that would be use, and if that were available would you > recommend it?
What is the modular version of such an approach? Just out of curiosity (I think a header like that would be very useful). _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
