[ Dropping core reflector ] Do you have a recommendation?
John. > On Mar 1, 2019, at 12:03 PM, Hubert Tong <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm still hoping for some SG10 guidance on whether we want to query on what > -> Concept does separately from whether Concept auto is available. There is > also static_assert(C<T>) in the mix somewhere. > > -- HT > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 8:45 AM John Spicer <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > That seems appropriate to me (copying the core reflector). > > John. > > > On Mar 1, 2019, at 7:21 AM, Jonathan Wakely <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > The working draft doesn't specify a __cpp_concepts macro. I want to know if > > I need to say "concept bool" or just "concept", so I expected to be able to > > do: > > > > #if __cpp_concepts > > template<typename T> > > concept > > #if __cpp_concepts <= 201507 > > bool > > #endif > > Foo = ...; > > #endif > > > > Should this be handled by a core issue? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Features mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features > > <http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features> > > _______________________________________________ > Features mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features > <http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features>
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
