On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 10:09 PM Barry Revzin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:39 AM Jason Merrill <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 9:36 PM Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> - <=> != == (should bump both the class nttp macro, and the 3-way >> >> comparison macro) >> > >> > Yes, we should do something about this. Per the above I think we should >> > take a holistic view for <=> feature macros. Bumping the class type NTTP >> > macro makes sense to me. Does any vendor advertise the old value yet? >> >> G++ does. > > Arguably, it shouldn't though? That version of NTTP is based on defaulted > operator<=>, and g++ doesn't implement operator<=> yet.
I suppose not, but I was skeptical of that relationship and figured people could check for op<=> separately. In any case, yes, bumping the NTTP macro value sounds good. Jason _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
