Thanks for that work, Barry!
I don’t disagree with any of your recommendations, and wholeheartedly agree
with your constexpr changes.
While going through it I found myself really not liking the name
“__cpp_familiar_template_lambda”: I find it quite opaque. Is there is an
opportunity to rename it to “__cpp_expl_lambda_template_parameters” or
something like that?
Daveed
> On Oct 3, 2019, at 11:56 PM, Barry Revzin via Core <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Hey SG10, CWG, and LWG,
>
> I went through the past few years of straw polls and put together a
> suggestion of what feature-test macros are missing: I'm proposing that about
> two dozen need to be added. The draft can be found here:
> https://brevzin.github.io/sd6/papers/d1902r0.html
> <https://brevzin.github.io/sd6/papers/d1902r0.html>.
>
> I included every paper on the straw polls pages, so if anybody has motivation
> for a macro for one of the papers I listed as "no macro necessary," please
> let me know. Also, if you disagree with any of my recommendations, also let
> me know. I already pruned an earlier list with some help, and I'd like to get
> this right.
>
> I wanted to get this out earlier than the weekend before the deadline, but...
> that didn't happen.
>
> Barry
> _______________________________________________
> Core mailing list
> [email protected]
> Subscription: https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/core
> Link to this post: http://lists.isocpp.org/core/2019/10/7332.php
_______________________________________________
Features mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
