On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 10:13 +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:38:25PM +0530, Kedar Sovani wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Kedar Sovani <[email protected]> > > --- > > rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch | 13 +++++++++++++ > > rpm.spec | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch > > > > diff --git a/rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch b/rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..d59b649 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/rpm-4.6.0-arm-isaname.patch > > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > > +--- rpm-4.6.0-rc1.orig/installplatform 2008-11-30 19:55:59.000000000 > > -0500 > > ++++ rpm-4.6.0-rc1/installplatform 2008-12-08 18:03:03.000000000 -0500 > > +@@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ for SUBST in $SUBSTS ; do > > + ISANAME=ia > > + ISABITS=64 > > + ;; > > ++ arm*) > > ++ ISANAME=`echo ${ARCH} | sed "s/\([^-]*\)-.*/\1/"` > > ++ ISABITS=32 > > ++ ;; > > + esac > > + > > + if [ -n "$MULTILIBNO" ]; then > > This looks sane, I suppose. Can you send this to the rpm-maint@ > mailing list and see what they think?
Yes, I did that in the morning :-). Waiting for moderator approval... Kedar. _______________________________________________ fedora-arm mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-arm
