On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:48:39AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:33 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote: > > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:25:43AM +0200, Andreas Thienemann wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I noticed some problems with mock, when building tools such as valgrind, > > > syslinux etc. on x86_64. > > > > > > The default mock config says to exclude i386 and similar packages. > > > > > > However, these programs depend on stubs-32.h from the i386 glibc-devel > > > package. > > > The x86_64 glibc-devel only brings stubs-64.h, which makes the > > > compilation > > > of these tools stop, because stubs-32.h could not be found. > > > > > > What would be the correct way of fixing this? > > > > You should still keep the 32bit glibc rpm packages. > > > > I've had this running at some point with the following yum repo: > > [devel-x86_64] > > name=Fedora Core Development for x86_64 > > baseurl=file:/mnt/raid/fedora/development/x86_64 > > exclude=*-debuginfo-* [!g]*.i686 [!g]*.i386 g[!l]*.i386 glib.i386 glib2.i386 > > > > > > Not sure the above still works or if there are nicer ways now todo the > > same within mock via other mechanisms. It should be something like > > "exclude all *.i686/*.i386 packages, but still keep glibc*.i686 installed". > > > > > > So you're saying that in order to build 64bit packages we REQUIRE > glibc*.i686? > > Are you serious? So there's no way to build x86_64 w/o i386 first being > built?
Hello Seth, No, just that glibc is an exception to the otherwise "only install 64bit rpm packages" rule for a buildroot. regards, Florian La Roche -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list