> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jesse Keating > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 4:48 PM > To: fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com > Subject: Re: New version of mock working (I think) > > On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 15:57 -0500, Clark Williams wrote: > > > > Hmm, that would mean that mock would have to be an XML-RPC > server. I > > like XML-RPC, but that might be a bit more complicated than is > > strictly needed. > > Does it really have to be a server? Could it be a push > rather than a poll? Mock could make xml-rpc calls to > whatever wraps around it.
Just catching up on weekend traffic here. XMLRPC is a great idea. I have implemented several xmlrpc servers in the past, and this is an idea that could work out well. Given the nature of mock, it would probably be best if it made calls into plague, rather than the other way around, but it wouldn't be _too_ much overhead to have a server that could be polled for status. I have mock hacking on my todo list for this week, so after I finish catching up with list traffic and get the latest prototype downloaded and building, I'll take a look at this. -- Michael -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
