-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:12 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: >> I hate to throw water on the fire, but to me XML-RPC seems like a >> sledgehammer. There's actually a ton of code in xmlrpclib.py and for >> this specific instance of pushing status information back to a >> controlling process, I think it's somewhat heavy-handed. > > And I'll just pick this point in the thread to say that I agree with > dcbw here.... KISS goes a long way. And while we can say that it's > configurable and you enable it if you want or don't if not -- that's > then two code paths for status to have to keep working and ensure we > don't break as well as maintaining them for some time >
So where were you guys when I was playing Horatius at the bridge? :) Clark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEoUsnHyuj/+TTEp0RAq4XAKDMeKTgIn1TkGA1ikNq9CzETi054ACfZF8L t2OhL8a/aKJ1QmxHpTq8jA0= =qSJp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
