Hi Mark, On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Mark Diggory <[email protected]> wrote: > I will briefly point out that once directory names get long, many projects > opt for a convention where the directory name is a segment of the > artifactId, something we do in DSpace 2.0 work that differs from dspace 1.x > project structure. > fedorarepo <-- artifactId = fedorarepo > webapp <-- artifactId = fedorarepo-webapp > fedora <-- artifactId = fedorarepo-webapp-fedora > fop <-- artifactId = fedorarepo-webapp-fop
Thanks for that insight. As long as we've got our groupId story straight, and the groupIds match the module/submodule hierarchy, the actual directory names could be in short or long form. For the upcoming release, whether to use short or long-form directory names is less critical a decision than the groupId structure, so I'd be comfortable changing this kind of thing after the release if others agree we should go that way. - Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers
