I remember your talk at Austin and have just reviewed it. I think the idea and 
its rationale are very good. In the case of GSearch, a first step could be to 
create Fedora objects that would hold the configuration files as datastreams. I 
will consider this in more detail soon.

Gert


On 12/10/2011, at 16.41, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here's a less straightforward idea, which I haven't put into a Jira issue 
> because it warrants discussion, if it evenis to become part of the roadmap.
> 
> At OR in Austin, I presented an indexing system (based partly on ideas from 
> GSearch, but not on the GSearch codebase) that we at UVa are working on. One 
> of the key principles of this system is that because discovery and 
> presentation for repository contents are increasingly based on indexes, and 
> because discovery and presentation are parts of curation (viewed broadly), it 
> is worthwhile to move the configuration of indexing workflows inside the 
> repository being indexed, so that indexing configuration "lives" alongside 
> the indexed contents and can be managed through the same services. (In the 
> example of our system, RELS-INT RDF connects metadata datastreams in 
> indexable objects with indexer objects that contain indexing transformations.)
> 
> I'd like to propose that the roadmap for GSearch include the task of making 
> it possible for users to move configuration for indexing transformations 
> (_not_ necessarily configuration for the connections between indexes and 
> repositories, but only the configuration of indexing transformations) 
> _inside_ the repositories being indexed.
> 
> One key affordance that would become available would be to manage indexing 
> transformations through the same APIs as are used for repository contents. 
> Because changing an index transformation would no longer require altering 
> material in the local GSearch install, but only the repository, all of the 
> wonderful functionality that Fedora already supplies in of the core 
> repository services would become available (e.g. XACML policy controls, 
> metadata associations, a nice RESTful API, etc.). 
> 
> Doing this would require much careful thought as to how to model and 
> structure representations of indexing transformations in the repository 
> context, but it could have great benefits, as tools to manage indexing would 
> be able to rely on work already done and in progress for the management of 
> ordinary repository contents.
> 
> 
> ---
> A. Soroka
> Online Library Environment
> the University of Virginia Library
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 12, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Gert Schmeltz Pedersen wrote:
> 
>> This message is meant to open for a discussion of the roadmap for GSearch. 
>> It started in a small group, but we invite participation from the wider 
>> group of fedora-developers. I copy this message to the fedora-users list so 
>> that GSearch users are informed about the discussion, but to follow it 
>> onwards and to contribute they have to subscribe to the fedora-developers 
>> list.
>> 
>> I will initiate the discussion with a status. GSearch 2.2 has been the 
>> current release since December 2008. At OR2011 in Austin in June 2011 I 
>> presented a plan for development of GSearch, see 
>> https://conferences.tdl.org/or/OR2011/OR2011main/paper/view/416/127 . 
>> Following that, I have provided GSearch 2.3, and the official release is 
>> near. You can get the source at https://github.com/fcrepo/gsearch and 
>> fedoragsearch.war from the DTU prerelease site at 
>> http://www.cvt.dk/fedoragsearch/ and see the documentation page at 
>> http://miranth.cvt.dk/fedoragsearch/ .
>> 
>> Next step in the plan is to provide GSearch 2.4 by the end of the year. I 
>> will use the issue tracker at 
>> https://jira.duraspace.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=10311
>>  to track the work, and I invite your feedback and contributions. Potential 
>> committers may be enrolled, I already had some responses to my invitation to 
>> potential committers at OR2011. Some of you may have heard at OR2011, that I 
>> will retire by the end of the year. However, I will continue part-time to 
>> support GSearch users on the fedora-users list and continue to develop for 
>> GSearch and Fedora in partnerships with people, who have an interest in that.
>> 
>> The post-2.4 roadmap discussion can both be on this list and as new or 
>> modified issues at the issue tracker. I think that members of the initial 
>> small group will soon bring up issues.
>> 
>> Gert
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
>> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
>> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
>> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct_______________________________________________
>> Fedora-commons-developers mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-commons-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers

Reply via email to